Monday, 14 March 2011
Some good discussion about issues around the Golden Rule
Should Humanism be added to the list of Golden Rule moral statements?
"Humanists like the Golden Rule because of its universality, because it is derived from human feelings and experience and because it requires people to think about others and try to imagine how they might think and feel. It is a simple and clear default position for moral decision-making.", see HERE
Bahá'í FaithLay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you, and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself. Bahá'u'lláh, Gleanings | ![]() |
BuddhismTreat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful. The Buddha, Udana-Varga 5.18 | ![]() |
ChristianityIn everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets. Jesus, Matthew 7:12 | ![]() |
ConfucianismOne word which sums up the basis of all good conduct....loving-kindness. Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself. Confucius, Analects 15.23 | ![]() |
HinduismThis is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you. Mahabharata 5:1517 | ![]() |
IslamNot one of you truly believes until you wish for others The Prophet Muhammad, Hadith | ![]() |
JainismOne should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated. Mahavira, Sutrakritanga 1.11.33 | ![]() |
JudaismWhat is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary. Go and learn it. Hillel, Talmud, Shabbath 31a | ![]() |
Native SpiritualityWe are as much alive as we keep the earth alive. Chief Dan George | ![]() |
SikhismI am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me. Guru Granth Sahib, p.1299 | ![]() |
TaoismRegard your neighbour's gain as your own gain and your neighbour's loss as your own loss. Lao Tzu, T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien, 213-218 | ![]() |
UnitarianismWe affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part. Unitarian principle | ![]() |
ZoroastrianismDo not do unto others whatever is injurious to yourself. Shayast-na-Shayast 13.29 | ![]() |
Saturday, 12 March 2011
Are MPs any better disciplined now than before the expenses scandal?
MPs are our employees in parliament. The system has allowed some of them to forget this.
Elections are job interviews. We need to get the rules right or you can end up with the wrong candidate stuck in the job — often for life.
The expenses scandal showed how deeply out of touch some of our politicians have become.
It arose from a culture where MPs were not responsive to their voters in the way they should be.
With AV, MPs will have to reach out to a wider range of voters to get elected.
To be sure of winning, they will have to work harder to attract the support of more than 50% of local people.
Friday, 11 March 2011
Thursday, 10 March 2011
"It is compassion that heals us..........." - Golden Rule Meditation Exercises
2.5 Meditation on compassion and healing
Materials required: a listing of the 13 expressions of the Golden Rule. To access this listing, click here. To avoid printing all five available languages, select only the language you need.
Steps:
Prepare yourself
Prepare yourself for meditation by any means that you find to be effective. You may want to consider Appendix 4: Tips for preparing for meditation and reflection.The Golden Rule
In a slow and reflective fashion, read the 13 expressions of the Golden Rule. Take as much time as you need with these writings.Compassion and healing
"It is compassion that heals us.
Click on link to see Scarboro Mission's wonderful set of example meditations on the Golden Rule as understood in various wisdom traditions.
Golden Rule - a school or college morality and ethics curriculum
The Golden Rule–A Basis for Morality and Ethics
Compiled by Brant Abrahamson and Fred Smith
Click on link to see Scarboro Missions curriculum
One-summit Universalism - Version 1: 10th March 2011
One-summit Universalism
Part I - The Whole beyond the Parts
There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but only one summit. The ‘summit’ is the exalted state of consciousness of the one who authentically & autonomously knows - and who also lives what she or he knows.
At the summit, when we look out, there is only mystery the formless whole in all directions.
The birds have vanished into the sky,
and now the last cloud drains away.
We sit together, the mountains and me,
until only the mountains remain.
Li Po (701-762)
To introduce a second metaphor we, and all forms, emerge, like a wave on the ocean, and after a while we return into the formless whole.
In mystery we are united. Our countless permutations of beliefs dissolve when we stand silent, word-less, before infinite mystery.
Standing before infinite mystery all are one - humanists, religionists, non-theists etc.
It is the only place at which we all are perfectly united.
At the place of mystery we are united because there are no concepts, beliefs or theology - no belief systems, no ‘I’m right and you’re wrong’.
At the ‘top of the mountain’ there is just silence, infinite space, no time - the awe and wonder of the view stretching out infinitely in every direction. In everyday life we get glimpses, flashes of this whole beyond this frenetic, contingent world. We all are mystics just as we all are philosophers, and poets, painters and dancers - they all are part of being human - from babyhood onwards.
When we stand before such mystery we are on the shoreline. It is the shore between the land of the known and knowable and the ocean of the unknown and unknowable. At that place we can turn to face the land of concepts - or the ocean of silence.
Facing the land there is the sweetness of language and concepts but in our engagement with the world comes disappointment, fear, envy etc. This means the ego rises - and torments.
When we turn back to face the ocean, or lose our ‘small self’ by becoming at-one with the ocean, then the ‘past-and-future-centred’ ego has stops its raging.
The more we can live in the now the more we bridge the two, the parts and the whole.
This infinite mystery can only be pointed at, not captured in concepts, creed or belief-system. What we need to do is hold that nowness more, to rest in it and let it expand - so that the torments of ego come back less and less - and less frequently overcome us.
We can’t capture the whole - but we can experience it - just as we experience the infinite ocean when we lose our sense of separateness in a warm, salty sea. We just can't conceptualize it, or measure it or weigh it.
To stand in front of infinite mystery is to experience awe and wonder and the ineffable. Poets, mystics and seers try to convey the reality but inevitably fail - often magnificently.
We can of course deny it by saying that there is nothing beyond what we understand.
Infinite mystery can only be pointed at. Concepts belong to the known and knowable realm. There is no conceptualization of the infinite by the finite. This is why for Buddhist there is no (naming of) God. The realm of the finite cannot deal in any comprehensive sense with the realm of the infinite. We can only inadequately, as poets and scholars, say how it is when we tremble and shiver through sensing the whole. The more we sense that whole the more relief we experience from egotistical lives, in which we guard the chimera of separate existence. At the centre of that ego-guarding is fear of annihilation.
The antidote lies in silence.
Part 2 - ‘Just below the summit ‘ - a chance for peace-making via ‘spiritual federalism’
Those who really know, when they stand at the summit, or just a bit further down the path up which they ascended, do not need help in recognizing others who have ascended via different paths.
For the rest of us there is some ‘technology’ that helps us overcome our fear, insularity and need to make others into enemies. With Karen Armstrong we can say that 1. the practice of compassion and 2. the deepening of sensibility through realization of the Golden Rule can help us toward what we might call ‘spiritual federalism’.
By this term I simply mean that we can continue to live in the ‘state’ of our own particular belief-system whilst acknowledging a federal ‘sameness’ that transcends my and most other belief systems.
This is based ultimately on recognition of our shared humanity; we all love and we all suffer.
Such a ‘dual allegiance’ enhances the particularity of a chosen belief system, not the opposite - unless we are led by closed-hearted preachers.
Closed-hearted preachers have a reasons for perpetuating exclusivity of the sect they lead. Some are gross reasons, power, money, status, money-extraction. Some are less gross but involve fear and ideas of salvation that ‘make-wrong’ the other.
The ‘technology’ of amplifying compassion and ‘Golden Rule realization’ is what is needed to open the hearts of those who are caged in exclusivist belief-systems. All the great wisdom traditions provide treasure-houses of teachings to help with this aim.
There are a number of great teachers of compassion and the Golden Rule from all wisdom traditions. For now I have chosen five. They also point to the stillness and silence beyond the pettiness of our concept-structures.
Part 3 - Five great ‘Pointers’ and livers of compassion and the Golden Rule
I have chosen five ‘pointers’ - figures about whom no claims of Divinity are made; but who all point to the Mystery with great eloquence, great profundity, great humility. They also have walked the talk in matters of compassion and the Golden Rule. They also do somewhat different jobs for us. I will provide sources for them all in due course. I have started with Tolle - see link below.
Abdu’l-Baha
Armstrong
Heschel
Tolle
Wilber
Albert Einstein Quotes on Spirituality
Albert Einstein Quotes on Spirituality
- I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details.
- Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.
- My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.
- The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
- Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.
- The scientists’ religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.
- There is no logical way to the discovery of elemental laws. There is only the way of intuition, which is helped by a feeling for the order lying behind the appearance.
- The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious; It is the source of all true art and science.
- We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
- Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods.
- When the solution is simple, God is answering.
- God does not play dice with the universe.
- God is subtle but he is not malicious.
- A human being is a part of the whole, called by us Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest-a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole nature in its beauty.
- Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet.
- The man who regards his own life and that of his fellow creatures as meaningless is not merely unfortunate but almost disqualified for life.
- Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.
- Only a life lived for others is a life worth while.
- The human mind is not capable of grasping the Universe. We are like a little child entering a huge library. The walls are covered to the ceilings with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written these books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. But the child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books—-a mysterious order which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects.
- The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity.
- What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism.
- The finest emotion of which we are capable is the mystic emotion. Herein lies the germ of all art and all true science. Anyone to whom this feeling is alien, who is no longer capable of wonderment and lives in a state of fear is a dead man. To know that what is impenetrable for us really exists and manifests itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty, whose gross forms alone are intelligible to our poor faculties - this knowledge, this feeling ... that is the core of the true religious sentiment. In this sense, and in this sense alone, I rank myself among profoundly religious men.
- The real problem is in the hearts and minds of men. It is easier to denature plutonium than to denature the evil spirit of man.
- True religion is real living; living with all one’s soul, with all one’s goodness and righteousness.
- Intelligence makes clear to us the interrelationship of means and ends. But mere thinking cannot give us a sense of the ultimate and fundamental ends. To make clear these fundamental ends and valuations and to set them fast in the emotional life of the individual, seems to me precisely the most important function which religion has to form in the social life of man.
Check out the source blog by clicking on the link.
Are you still dissatisfied when munching concepts, however delicious? - Eternal wisdom for our time from the mystical heart of Abraham Joshua Heschel

"Our concern with environment cannot be reduced to what can be used, to what can be grasped. Environment includes not only the inkstand and the blotting paper, but also the impenetrable stillness in the air, the stars, the clouds, the quiet passing of time, the wonder of my own being. I am an end as well as a means, and so is the world: an end as well as a means. My view of the world and my understanding of the self determine each other. Forfeit your sense of awe, let your conceit diminish your ability to revere, and the world becomes a market place for you. The complete manipulation of the world results in the complete instrumentalization of the self."
"Humankind will not die out for lack of information, but for we may perish for want of appreciation."
"In a free society, some are guilty, but all are responsible."
- Abraham Joshua Heschel
The antidote to our current self destruction is to be found in the glorious vision of what it is to be truly human
as Heschel describes it in his Who is Man?

Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (2nd from right) in the Selma Civil Rights Marchwith Martin Luther King, Jr. (4th from right)
-0-
What’s the worst thing about First Past The Post? | Yes to fairer votes - Yes to AV - Alternative Vote
1. FPTP means politicians take voters for granted
With First Past the Post voters are not created equal. Parties steer well clear of the 'safe seats' the system creates, because they know those elections will be won or lost without them lifting a finger.
Either way it's simply not worth the effort. Instead it's in the few seats where the winner isn't known where politicians do all they can to win. And the result? A handful of lucky voters in these marginal seats decide our elections.
In the 2010 election, most of us were ignored by political parties; the result was effectively decided by just 460,000 people — just 1.6% of the electorate. FPTP lets parties cynically target that handful of marginal voters in a few marginal seats.
Scarboro Missions - How to Order the Golden Rule Poster
For those who aren't locked into exclusivity and for those who practice 'Compassion and the Golden Rule'
Scarboro Missions seem to exemplary in that they are clearly committed to their faith but have supported the Golden Rule initiative for a very long time. Bravo!
Click on link to get their materials.
No two religions agree - right? Peace impossible - right? Check this out!
The Golden Rule Across the World's Religions
Thirteen Sacred Texts - English Version
Bahá'í Faith
Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you, and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself.
Bahá'u'lláh, Gleanings
Buddhism
Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
The Buddha, Udana-Varga 5.18
Christianity
In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.
Jesus, Matthew 7:12
Confucianism
One word which sums up the basis of all good conduct....loving-kindness. Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.
Confucius, Analects 15.23
Hinduism
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you.
Mahabharata 5:1517
Islam
Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others
what you wish for yourself.The Prophet Muhammad, Hadith
Jainism
One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated.
Mahavira, Sutrakritanga 1.11.33
Judaism
What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary. Go and learn it.
Hillel, Talmud, Shabbath 31a
Native Spirituality
We are as much alive as we keep the earth alive.
Chief Dan George
Sikhism
I am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me.
Indeed, I am a friend to all.Guru Granth Sahib, p.1299
Taoism
Regard your neighbour's gain as your own gain and your neighbour's loss as your own loss.
Lao Tzu, T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien, 213-218
Unitarianism
We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
Unitarian principle
Zoroastrianism
Do not do unto others whatever is injurious to yourself.
Shayast-na-Shayast 13.29
Acknowledgements: This original English version was prepared by Paul McKenna.
Published by Scarboro Missions (Toronto, Canada)
Copyright © Scarboro Missions 2000
Great resources for those interested in Karen Armstrong's latest initiative on Compassion and the Golden Rule are to be found at www.scarboromissions.ca
Wednesday, 9 March 2011
BBC News - AV voting referendum: Katie Ghose's viewpoint
AV voting referendum: Katie Ghose's viewpoint
By Katie Ghose Chair, Yes to Fairer VotesKatie Ghose says the current system is broken and change is needed
A referendum will be held on 5 May on whether to keep the first-past-the-post system for electing MPs or to switch to the Alternative Vote (AV). The BBC is asking a variety of people to give their view.
"The Alternative Vote is a small change that will make a big difference - making MPs work harder to get and stay elected, and giving you more of a say.
No wonder the old political establishment will say anything to cling on to the old rules.
They will say anything to defend a broken system that can let them win power with just one in three voters on their side.
A system that has let them enjoy jobs for life in safe seats. A system that has bred the complacency we all saw in the expenses scandal.
The last general election was decided by fewer than 450,000 voters in marginal seats.
Two thirds of our MPs don't have the majority of voters on their side - so most of us are now represented by MPs that most of us didn't vote for.
It is not right, and in this referendum you can change the rules.
AV takes what works with our current system and improves on it - making MPs work harder to win and keep their jobs.
Continue reading the main storyTHE REFERENDUM CHOICE
At the moment MPs are elected by the first-past-the-post system, where the candidate getting the most votes in a constituency is elected.
On 5 May all registered UK voters will be able to vote Yes or No on whether to change the way MPs are elected to the Alternative Vote system.
Under the Alternative Vote system, voters rank candidates in their constituency in order of preference.
Anyone getting more than 50% of first-preference votes is elected.
If no-one gets 50% of votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their backers' second choices allocated to those remaining.
This process continues until one candidate has at least 50% of all votes in that round.
A 'Yes' vote means all the candidates who want to be your next MP will have to aim for 50% support in the communities they seek to represent. MPs will have to work harder to win - and keep - your support, reaching out to voters they can no longer afford to ignore.
A 'Yes' vote will give you more say. AV lets you can rank candidates and show support for anyone you feel is up to the job. So if your favourite candidate doesn't win, you can still help decide your next MP.
Good news for the millions of us forced into tactical voting.
Bad news for extremists, like the BNP, because candidates who will not reach out have no future.
AV is not revolutionary. It is a small, sensible step that builds on the current system, preserving and strengthening the link between MPs and their voters.
This referendum is a straight choice between a broken system and a better alternative.
Say Yes to AV."
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
TED Blog | On the 12 steps to a compassionate life: Q&A with Karen Armstrong
On the 12 steps to a compassionate life: Q&A with Karen Armstrong
This week, religious scholar and 2008 TED Prize winner Karen Armstrong released 12 Steps to a Compassionate Life, a practical guide to the understanding and practice of compassion. On Christmas eve, the TED Blog had a chat with Karen about the ways people around the world are embracing the Charter for Compassion — the result of her TED Prize wish –- a year from its launch, the importance of kindness in discourse, and the perennial human struggle to put others first.
How did this book come about?
For the last couple of years, since winning the TED Prize and launching the Charter for Compassion, I’ve been going around the world promoting compassion. Frequently, people ask, “Well, how on Earth do we begin? It all seems so huge.”
People are hungry to understand what compassion means and how to go about practicing it. But simply deciding to become compassionate is too daunting. Meanwhile, we’re so uneducated about compassion. It’s often just equated with pity. But the word “compassion” means to feel or experience with the other person – to put yourself consistently in other another’s shoes. We have to feel and take responsibility for the well-being of others, whoever they are.
So the book, which is modeled on the Alcoholics Anonymous 12-step program, offers a step-by-step guide to understanding compassion, then integrating it into daily life. Each step – beginning with “Learn About Compassion” and ending with “Love Your Enemies” – is a practice. The idea is to start with step one and not move on until the practice has slowly become part of your daily routine.
We’ve had a very excited response so far. People are saying, “Oh, thank heavens, now we can finally get down to it and find out what to do.”
How have people been using the Charter, and what role will the book play in helping to achieve its goals?
The Charter doesn’t tell people what to do, but institutions and organizations already working on compassionate issues are applying its principles to their own needs. We’ve got 150 partners now worldwide, with a wide variety of initiatives.
One partner, for example, has devised a program for prison reform, whereby inmates are treated in a more compassionate way. It’s a very detailed work and psychological plan. When it put into practice, it was hoped that violence within the prisons would decrease by 2.5 percent. In fact, there was a 100 percent drop.
We’re also developing a 10 Year Campaign for Compassionate Cities project. It started in Seattle, which affirmed the Charter declared itself a City of Compassion last April. They’re encouraging other cities worldwide to join them, gradually building up a network of compassionate cities. We hope that once this is set up, students in different cities will be able to form electronic friendships so there can be exchanges to help break down the residue of prejudice and misunderstanding.
Charter ambassadors in Pakistan, meanwhile, are making a big push to create courses in compassion in schools, colleges and universities. Pakistan may become one of the leaders of the Charter, which would be an amazing thing – and a hugely positive message to the world – given that they are on the frontline of our present problems.
I hope the book will serve as a practical guide in all these initiatives. To address the special needs of Pakistan, I’ve written a short supplement, stressing an Islamic take on the 12 steps. And in the cities project, there’s the idea that a whole city would read the book for awhile. Online discussions about the book across cultures are a possibility, too.
What do you think is the biggest obstacle to experiencing compassion or understanding compassion, and then more importantly, acting on it?
Oh, just superciliousness, I think – a feeling of sophisticated disdain that “This won’t work.” And secondly, a sense of defeat, that the world’s problems are of such magnitude that people feel paralyzed. Also, there’s egotism: people don’t want to put others before themselves.
We are addicted to our egotism, our likes and dislikes and prejudices, and depend upon them for our own sense of identity. When we come out with a clever and unpleasant remark about somebody else, we get a rush of self-satisfaction. Unfortunately, that hit poisons us, and it poisons the atmosphere around us.
I begin the book by explaining, almost in neurological terms, how central our survival mechanism is, and how it can make us lash out violently at others, making people aware of these aggressive tendencies. These automatic reflexes are very strong. If a tiger suddenly jumps into the room, we’re designed to get up and run for our lives or shoot it, not sit and meditate, or try to make friends with it.
But we can’t afford that aggressive tendency to dominate our dangerously polarized world. People are reluctant to accept that our enemies are not separate from ourselves, and treat them with contempt, or with violence. And we still think suffering happens far away. In fact, we are connected whether we like it or not – we’re electronically, educationally, financially and economically interdependent as never before – and our perceptions haven’t yet caught up with that. Compassion is now central to our survival, and the book tries to help people to integrate this global thinking into their daily lives.
Do you think that in the past, compassion was more prevalent, and as societies became more secular we somehow lost our capacity for it? Or has human capacity for compassion has evolved over time?
No. I think it’s always been a struggle to be compassionate. It’s a struggle to our dying day, because we like to put ourselves first. Religions have always stressed that compassion is not only central to religious life, it is the key to enlightenment and it the true test of spirituality. But there have always have been those who’d rather put easier goals, like doctrine conformity, in place. We’ve made religion simply a matter of believing a set of doctrines – so much so that we call religious people “believers”. The practice of compassion is left far behind.
Compassion is a practically acquired knowledge, like dancing. You must do it and practice diligently day by day. A trained body can perform feats that are utterly impossible for an untrained body, which look inhuman but remain human. By practicing compassion fastidiously, it’s possible to acquire new capabilities in mind and heart, but you must work at it.
I’m particularly anxious to make us conscious of the lack of compassion in public and private discourse. Debates in society are often extremely aggressive. Look at the recent election in the United States, or the level of rhetoric that has surfaced over this community center near Ground Zero. In academic media, mainstream media, politics – debate is no longer an effort to seek the truth. Instead we want to attack, humiliate and defeat our opponents. Socrates said that dialogue must be conducted gently, and the point of dialogue is that nobody can win because all the participants end up realizing how little they know.
Do you find it a struggle to be compassionate on a daily basis?
Of course. I used to be a very unkind person because I was so unhappy
Click on link to read the full article
How much of the world's wisdom is encapsulated in the first 822 words of Eckhart Tolle's 'Stillness Speaks'?
Chapter 1: Silence & Stillness 1) Stillness is your essential nature. What is stillness? The inner space or awareness in which the words on this page are being perceived and become thoughts. Without that awareness, there would be no perception, no thoughts, no world. -0- 2) When you lose touch with inner stillness, you lose touch with yourself. When you lose touch with yourself, you lose yourself in the world. -0-3) Your innermost sense of self, of who you are, is inseparable from stillness. This is the I Am that is deeper than name and form. -0- 4) Stillness is your essential nature. What is stillness? The inner space or awareness in which the words on this page are being perceived and become thoughts. Without that awareness, there would be no perception, no thoughts, no world. -0- 5) You are that awareness, disguised as a person. -0- 6) The equivalent of external noise is the inner noise of thinking. The equivalent of external silence is inner stillness. -0-7) Whenever there is some silence around you listen to it. That means just notice it. Pay attention to it. Listening to silence awakens the dimension of stillness within yourself, because it is only through stillness that you can be aware of silence. -0- 8) See that in the moment of noticing the silence around you, you are not thinking. You are aware, but not thinking. -0- 9) When you become aware of silence, immediately there is that state of inner still alertness. You are present. You have stepped out of thousands of years of collective human conditioning. -0 10) Look at a tree, a flower, a plant. Let your awareness rest upon it. How still they are, how deeply rooted in Being. Allow nature to teach you stillness. -0- 11) When you look at a tree and perceive its stillness, you become still yourself. You connect with it at a very deep level. You feel a oneness with whatever you perceive in and through stillness. Feeling the oneness of yourself with all things is true love. -0- 12) Silence is helpful, but you don’t need it in order to nd stillness. Even when there is noise, you can be aware of the stillness underneath the noise, of the space in which the noise arises. That is the inner space of pure awareness, consciousness itself. -0- 13) You can become aware of awareness as the background to all your sense perceptions, all your thinking. Becoming aware of awareness is the arising of inner stillness. -0- 14) Any disturbing noise can be as helpful as silence. How? By dropping your inner resistance to the noise, by allowing it to be as it is, this acceptance also takes you into that realm of inner peace that is stillness. -0- 15) Whenever you deeply accept this moment as it is no matter what form it takes you are still, you are at peace. -0- 16) Pay attention to the gap the gap between two thoughts, the brief, silent space between words in a conversation, between the notes of a piano or flute, or the gap between the in-breath and out-breath. -0- 17) When you pay attention to those gaps, awareness of "something" becomes just awareness. The formless dimension of pure consciousness arises from within you and replaces identication with form. -0- 18) True intelligence operates silently. Stillness is where creativity and solutions to problems are found. -0- 19) Is stillness just the absence of noise and content? No, it is intelligence itself the underlying consciousness out of which every form is born. And how could that be separate from who you are? The form that you think you are came out of that and is being sustained by it. 20) It is the essence of all galaxies and blades of grass; of all flowers, trees, birds, and all other forms. -0- 21) Stillness is the only thing in this world that has no form. But then, it is not really a thing, and it is not of this world. -0- 20) When you look at a tree or a human being in stillness, who is looking? Something deeper than the person. Consciousness is looking at its creation. -0- 21) In the Bible, it says that God created the world and saw that it was good. That is what you see when you look from stillness without thought. -0- 22) Do you need more knowledge? Is more information going to save the world, or faster computers, more scientific or intellectual analysis? Is it not wisdom that humanity needs most at this time? -0-23) But what is wisdom and where is it to be found? Wisdom comes with the ability to be still. Just look and just listen. No more is needed. Being still, looking and listening activates the non-conceptual intelligence within you. Let stillness direct your words and actions. -0-
822 words----------------------------
Monday, 7 March 2011
What's your preferred definition of 'namaste'?
"I honor the Spirit in you which is also in me." -- attributed to but not claimed by author Deepak Chopra"I honor the place in you in which the entire Universe dwells, I honor the place in you which is of Love, of Integrity, of Wisdom and of Peace. When you are in that place in you, and I am in that place in me, we are One.""That which is of God in me greets that which is of God in you.""The Divinity within me perceives and adores the Divinity within you.'
My preferred definition is the second one;




















