Saturday, 29 August 2009

My sites and their connections!

MY SITES Updated 29th Aug 2009:

I discovered that I had started 28 blogs. After the shock I have rationalized them to those below;

Human-centred Studies courses are HERE

4 additional sites support the Human-centred Studies courses site;

Dictionary of Concepts and Terms – for all of my sites is HERE – glossary for all my blogs + budding articles (tell me what needs to be added)

Quotations Treasury – is HERE – a personal data-base of stuff – I wish I had done this before and during my PhD studies! It’s public so others can benefit from it – will be more and more useful as the months go by.

OneSummit: many paths – click HERE the Perennial Wisdom/Philosophy inter-faith/pan-faith/no-faith spirituality section of the courses – especially for those students who have done Perennial Wisdom/Philosophy courses with me.

My doctorate – To go to PhD click HERE

Bahá’í in Process is HEREissues concerning the processes in, on and around the Bahá’í community and its teachings (incorporating Bahá’í Education and Bahá’í-inspired education)

Short-term blog on Reform UK Politics NOW - HERE – we have a once-in-a-life-time chance to get fair voting etc in the UK – because of expenses scandal

Baha’i Coherence – (NB a group blog) – http://bahaicoherence.blogspot.com/

1000 ways (SunWALKed) ‘meta-site’ click HERE – most of my posts from niche sites also posted there (my original and catch-all site)

My Posterous site – SunWALKing - is - HERE (also posts to FaceBook, etc)

-0-

Marion Prentice ArtworkHERE

Our China photos are here;

China 1 – http://chinajourneys.blogspot.com/

China 2 – http://chinajourneys2.blogspot.com/

-0-

Tuesday, 18 August 2009

Interesting news via Ian Dale

Top 30 MP Blogs

Iain Dale 2:55 PM

Here are the first ten of the Top 30 MP Blogs. For the full list click HERE.
1 (2) Tom Harris LA
2 (1) John Redwood CO
3 (12) Douglas Carswell CO
4 (4) Nadine Dorries CO
5 (8) Kerry McCarthy LA
6 (3) Tom Watson LA
7 (6) Adam Price PC
8 (5) Lynne Featherstone LD
9 (10) David Jones CO
10 (11) Paul Flynn LA

This list is the result of more than 1,500 people who voted in the Total Politics Annual Blog Poll during the second half of July.

Click on the blog to visit it. For a full list of parliamentarians with blogs click HERE.

All these lists, together with articles from leading blog commentators, will be published in the TOTAL POLITICS GUIDE TO POLITICAL BLOGGING, which will be published in mid September at £12.99. You can preorder your copy HERE.

COMING NEXT: Top 50 Non Aligned Blogs

Wednesday, 29 July 2009

UK politics - your chance to vote for a change - right now

Hi,

I've signed a letter to Gordon Brown asking for a referendum at the next election on the way we elect our politicians. As a supporter of the Vote for a Change campaign I believe there's been too much talk and not enough action on bringing about the reform at Westminster we need to clean up our politics. Here's where you can sign up too;


-0-

It's time for a referendum on the electoral system

Voters should be directly involved in shaping the process of selecting their MPs.

We call on the shamed politicians of the UK to hold a referendum on the electoral system no later than the next general election - June 3rd 2010.

.....0.....

The site says;

'Reports in today's (26.07.2009) Observer suggest the government is prepared to meet our call for a referendum at the next General Election.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/26/referendum-constitutional-reform-labour-elections

It is good news that the government appears to have conceded the principle of referendum on voting reform. It provides some evidence that the current crop are actually capable of change.

But Brown has not moved nearly far enough. Yes, this crisis of accountability requires a change in the fundamentals of politics - and that begins at the ballot box. But a choice between the status quo and system decided on by the government displays much of the same 'Westminster Villager' thinking that got us into this mess.

No employer would let job applicants rule on recruitment, employment and retention - the decision over votes must be given to the British people.

Now is the time for us all to make the final push. We need your help, and you can start today by telling your friends to sign up.

http://voteforachange.co.uk/invite


The wisest decision Brown could make is to take the choice of system out of the hands of politicians. The public have a right to rule on the type of politics they want to see at Westminster, not to be told what they want by its current inhabitants.

MPs are right to worry about the collapse of trust in politics. But rebuilding it requires them to trust the voters.'

......0.....


Go HERE to see the Vote for a Change site

Saturday, 25 July 2009

SoulPancake | What will it really take to make loving your enemies possible?

Click on link to go to site

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

Friday, 24 July 2009

Women as the voice of conscience in and for Iran

There can’t be a happy ending to our story, if only the human rights of certain segments of society are considered

soheila_vahdati02Editor’s Note:  Dr. Vahdati is an Iranian-American human rights activist and freelance writer who has published extensively on the effects of the death penalty, women’s rights and gender issues in Iranian journals.  Dr. Vahdati published the following article in the online Persian journal Iran-Emrooz, addressed to Mrs. Fakhri Mohtashamipour, wife of Seyyed Mostafa Tajzadeh, who served as the Political Vice Minister of the Ministry of the Interior of Iran in the government of President Mohammad Khatami.  Tajzadeh was arrested in June 2009, amidst the Iranian election protests.

Click on link to read the article

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

Wednesday, 22 July 2009

What do Bigfoot believers, ‘Intelligent Design’ cheats, and ‘Panaphonic’ and ‘Somy’ electrical gear fraudsters have in common?

big-foot-steveSeeing is believing – this shows incontrovertible proof that bigfoots exist!

-0-

. What do Bigfoot believers, ‘Intelligent Design’ cheats, and ‘Panaphonic’ and ‘Somy’ electrical gear  fraudsters have in common?

– my response to Brendan Cook’s article ‘Bears in the Woods’

.

Brendan Cook has written an extraordinarily well-crafted piece entitled - The Bears in the Woods. It clinically exposes various kinds of fraud and fraudulent thinking.

.

This post of mine is by way of an appreciative response, and an attempt to show what underlies the kinds of fraud about which Brendan so eloquently writes.

.

The subjects of The Bears in the Wood are a roll call of evils buzzing around in our world – deception, self-deception, sowing confusion, superstition, fundamentalism, forms of truth-telling masquerading as their opposite number……

.

These, and a whole fist-full of others, are the symptoms – but what is the disease?

.

The disease is the inability, or unwillingness, to understand the different forms of truth-telling.  Ken Wilber has described the three ways of truth, and their telling, in two or three of his books.  He called them the ‘I’ ‘WE’ and ‘IT’ voices, three means by which we investigate reality and express ourselves.

.

There’s nothing strange about I, WE and IT they are our forms of expression that correspond to the three major academic groupings the Arts, The Sciences and The Humanities.

.

If you are a Scientist you are concerned, primarily, with IT-truth i.e. the kind of truth-telling about objective reality, using the methodologies of science.

.

If you are an Arts-person you are primarily concerned with I-truth – the subjective truth that says ‘this is how it looks and feels to me, where I am, being me’.

.

If you are a Humanities person you are, primarily, concerned, primarily with moral truth – as action in the world.

.

Of course each form of truth-telling makes use of the other two – we are after all a single individuation of the human spirit!

.

Interestingly spiritual-mystical experience is inevitably an ‘I’ form of truth-telling – it can be no other, and the mystical is the core of religion and religiosity.  However the study of religion and the action of religion falls under the moral truth of the Humanities.

.

Religion is harmful, useless even, not only if it is the cause of conflict but also if it fails to lead to right action, in the world, in service of others.

.

I have published 21 posts (of varying length and quality!) on our three I, WE and IT ways of being, expressing, and doing,  i.e.  HERE

.

The reasons that people are deceived, or self-deceive, are of course, a different subject.  They might include the need for a security blanket, the need for certainty, the need to be right, the need to be on a side that looks like the winning group, the desire to be of the chosen people etc.

.

Of course there are also plenty of snake-oil salesmen willing to start a religious group through which  they can manipulate and exploit those with such needs as I’ve listed above.  Fundamentalism is as Karen Armstrong says ‘the lust for certainty’.  Intelligent design is an unwillingness to focus on the real benefit of religion as an inspiring story and focus instead on mind-bending, mind-destroying literalism.

.

Karen Armstrong is one of two writers who brilliantly expose the nonsense of misappropriating the methods and claims of one form of truth-telling in trying to operate in another.  (Terry Eagleton is the other).  Key to this understanding is the restitution of Mythos (heart-knowing, intuition) as the partner to Logos (reason, head-knowing).  For more on this see my posts, (of variable length and quality!) - HERE

.

There is I believe a positive correlation between the historic subjugation of women and the sustained attempt to eliminate the voice of Mythos. Although the in-validation of Mythos is not strictly a gender issue, more the invalidation of the feminine, heart-knowing ,voice.    (Mythos unlike Logos isn’t in the WORD 2007 dictionary – it slipped away like women in history)

.

Armstrong again writes at length about the restitution of Mythos, to counter-balance Logos, in her latest book HERE

.

Two of the key phrases in The Bears in the Woods are;

.

1) ‘and his standard of proof changes‘ – (the Bigfoot believer, Intelligent Designer believer etc) -  this of course points up the need to have moral integrity and the ability to understand the positives and negatives of the three major forms of truth-telling.  Above all it points up the hypocrisy of relying on a set of criteria only when it suits pre-judice.

.

2) ‘he’s doing for personal fulfillment‘ (the Bigfoot believer) – this is a clear example of what happens when we are demanding one set of truth by misapplying and distorting one set of truth-telling rules.  The individual, the big-foot believer should be doing art about fantasy creatures instead of trying to justify the unjustifiable via unwarranted ‘scientific’ assertions.  This of course is ‘scientism’.

.

Is ‘religionism’ a co-equivalent term for scientism? – to describe the mis-application of its form of truth-telling?  There is dire need for such a term.

.

Another excellent cultural critic Terry Eagleton has also recently published a book highly relevant to this discussion.  There is a review of both Armstrong’s book and the Eagleton book –  HERE

.

What do Bigfoot believers, ‘Intelligent Design’ cheats, and ‘Panaphonic’ and ‘Somy’ electrical gear fraudsters have in common? – ultimately an aversion to truth and integrity and honesty.  What is the antidote?

.

Education is the answer, but between the cynical exploitation of children and youth, as in the deification of wretched specimens like Michael Jackson, and the equally cynical exploitation of the parents by snake-oil religionists it takes special souls to escape the morass!

.

Understanding the difference between I truth, IT truth and WE truth can help some.  Others are just on the make, or simply feel snug in their fundamentally-wrapped-up world.

.

Why see shades of grey when black and white thinking gives so much more self-satisfaction?

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

Monday, 20 July 2009

Jimmy Carter still has the courage to stand up for gender equality

  • Jimmy Carter
  • July 15, 2009
Illustration: Dyson

Illustration: Dyson

Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.

I HAVE been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

Click on link to read the 'age' article.

My admiration for the man has soared.

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

Sunday, 19 July 2009

What exactly are religion and spirituality and what are they for?

signpost

QUESTION: “What exactly is religion, how’s it distinct from spirituality and what’s it for?”

1 “What is religion?” - Religion is organised spirituality –

a) self-organized, integrated, focused consciousness (+ or -) in the case of the individual,

b) group-organized in the case of sects etc.

2 “What is spirituality?” - Spirituality is that which isn’t physical.  Includes the intellect!

3 “Again what is spirituality?” - Spirituality is feeling (heart) – preferably supported by reason, and right action.

Dawkins = ultimate narrow view

Karen Armstrong & Terry Eagleton = broad view

4 “Again what is spirituality?” - Spirituality is encounter and experience in how we relate to the unknown and unknowable – to Ultimate reality + reflection.

Subsequent to encounter spirituality becomes the eyes with which we see, the ears with which we hear

Belief, objectively true or false, is the meaning and motivation we derive from encounter, and allied experiences + reflection + study.  This provides our worldview.

5 “What is mysticism?” – Mysticism (the real stuff c.f. self-delusion or mental illness) = the heart of spirituality, and (the means to) true religion –

”Mystical experience…..does not seem to me to be anything other than first-hand religious experience as such. This is, however, the core of religion…..…the explanatory function of religion is secondary and derivative.” (Hick)

6 “What is the worldview that each of us has?” - Our worldview is how we ‘read’ the world. Our worldview includes that of which are conscious, plus that which derives from enculturation & socialization.

7 “How is our worldview formed?” - Enculturation, socialization, beliefs and world-view determines our identity – and therefore our actions.  (E.g. –  Taliban – no school for girls, blow-up priceless Buddhist sculptures!)

8 “What is the process of true religion and spirituality?” – Becoming more fully conscious of Oneness, and its implications, and acting accordingly, is our purpose.  (This is also a definition of faith ‘Consious knowledge + right action’.

9  So religion =

a) PERSONALLY – encounter experiences, inc. of Ultimate Reality, and reflectively what we make of them

b) SOCIALLY – any agreed set of relationships, teachings and customs held in common with any religious group of which one has membership, to which we subscribe.

10 Rituals, prayer, meditation & other practice = remembrance + short-cuts to possible encounter experiences (but thoughts of the washing or shopping may get in the way).

11 Progress in spirituality is measured by regularly bringing oneself to account – in relation to the standards of your spirituality, world-view and religious group/s (if any).

—–0—–

Etymological issues:

The English word “religion” is derived from the Middle English “religioun” which came from the Old French “religion.” It may have been originally derived from the Latin word “religo” which means “good faith,” “ritual,” and other similar meanings. Or it may have come from the Latin “religãre” which means “to tie fast.”

Start doing your own research:

One good starting point is provided by the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance.  See HERE

The definitions I like best from this source are;

George Hegel: “the knowledge possessed by the finite mind of its nature as absolute mind.”

Paul Tillich: “Religious is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern”

Others are;

The Religious Tolerance group tell us that David Carpenter has collected and published a list of definitions of religion, including:

1 Anthony Wallace: “a set of rituals, rationalized by myth, which mobilizes supernatural powers for the purpose of achieving or preventing transformations of state in man or nature.”

2 Hall, Pilgrim, and Cavanagh: “Religion is the varied, symbolic expression of, and appropriate response to that which people deliberately affirm as being of unrestricted value for them.”

3 Karl Marx: “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.”

Don Swenson defines religion in terms of the sacred: “Religion is the individual and social experience of the sacred that is manifested in mythologies, ritual, ethos, and integrated into a collective or organization.”

4 Paul Connelly also defines religion in terms of the sacred and the spiritual: “Religion originates in an attempt to represent and order beliefs, feelings, imaginings and actions that arise in response to direct experience of  the sacred and the spiritual. As this attempt expands in its formulation and elaboration, it becomes a process that creates meaning for itself on a sustaining basis, in terms of both its originating experiences and its own continuing responses.”

5 He defines sacred as: “The sacred is a mysterious manifestation of power and presence that is experienced as both primordial & transformative, inspiring awe & rapt attention. This is usually an event that represents a break or discontinuity from the ordinary, forcing a re-establishment or recalibration of perspective on the part of the experiencer, but it may also be something seemingly ordinary, repeated exposure to which gradually produces a perception of mysteriously cumulative significance out of proportion to the significance originally invested in it.”

He further defines the spiritual as: “The spiritual is a perception of the commonality of mindfulness in the world that shifts the boundaries between self and other, producing a sense of the union of purposes of self and other in confronting the existential questions of life, and providing a mediation of the challenge-response interaction between self and other, one and many, that underlies existential questions.”

CONCLUSION to QUESTION: “What exactly is religion, how’s it distinct from spirituality and whats’ it for?”

“What exactly is religion,”

Religion personally = a) encounter experiences, inc. of Ultimate Reality, and what we make of them.

Religion socially/organizationally =  any agreed set of relationships, teachings and customs held in common with any religious group of which one has membership, and to which we subscribe.  The ‘to which we subscribe bit’ because many Catholics don’t agree with e.g. no-contraception and I once found that 40% of a class in a RC school believed in reincarnation!

“how’s it distinct from spirituality and”

Religion is a) ways to institutionalize organized spirituality and b) ways for maximising the chances for more religious experiences, and for hearing good reflection on such experiences.  Moral behaviour and service action should follow!  Spirituality is a natural and almost omnipresent part of being human like philosophising, creating, loving or breathing.  Spirituality does necessarily need religion but, at best, can greatly benefit from it.

“whats’ it for?”

Religion, and responsible spirituality, are means to help us become more fully, positively and integratedly human in order to be of service to others.  In doing this we develop higher-order qualities and virtues.  It is not unreasonable to suppose that the absolute form of such qualities and virtues are the names and attributes of God, and that in acquiring them to an above average degree is worthy of the appellation ‘truly religious, truly spiritual’.

-0-

To read the full article by the Religious Tolerance group go HERE

Reference:

Hick, John, (1981) Mystical Experience as Cognition in Understanding Mysticism, ed. Richard Woods, London: The Athlone Press – p423

My final question – “Why are there so many religious intolerance groups?”

Dr Roger Prentice – main site = www.pre.me.uk

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

START FREEDOM! - STOP PEOPLE TRAFFIC - STOP MODERN DAY SLAVERY

Are you ready to START FREEDOM?  
 

These young people are taking part in START FREEDOM

Image: still from the START FREEDOM film.

WATCH THIS
SIGN UP YOUR SCHOOL
SIGN UP YOUR YOUTH PROJECT

1) Sign up & be part of START FREEDOM to STOP THE TRAFFIK www.startfreedom.org

2) Forward this e-mail to any students, teachers or youth leaders that you know.

3) To find out how you can get this into your local sc

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

Saturday, 18 July 2009

Perennial Philosophy course - request for help with course materials

Perennial Philosophy course – request for help with course materials

Perennial_Philosophy_cover

I have to prepare a course on ‘Perennial Philosophy’.  Perennial Philosophy is a not very suitable name for the spiritual/mystical core said to be the same in all of the great world faiths.

I have some material but would be grateful if anyone has other sources to point me to or positive suggestions for a new approach.

Thanks

Roger

Posted via web from sunwalking's posterous

About Me

My Photo
Roger (Dr Roger Prentice)
1) Finding ways to celebrate the human spirit! - My meta-site - i.e it brings together all of the niche sites - is at www.pre.me.uk 1) Urging UK Political Reform - fair voting now!
View my complete profile

ShareThis